Primary Source Set

The Eugenics Movement in North Carolina

Between 1929 and 1974, over 7,600 people were sterilized, or made unable to have children, in North Carolina. Sterilization was a key part of eugenics, a theory and movement that claimed it could improve humankind through selective breeding. Through sterilization, North Carolina restricted the fertility of individuals that were considered “undesirable.” Many were forced or coerced into sterilization. This primary source set uses newspaper articles, newspaper advertisements, and a bulletin to illustrate the effects of sterilization, eugenic ideas, and eugenic legislation in North Carolina.

Proceed with caution and care through these materials as the content may be disturbing or difficult to review. Many primary sources in this set use eugenicist ideas to support the discrimination of non-white people and people with mental illness or mental disability. Please read DigitalNC’s Harmful Content statement for further guidance.

Time Period

1912-2014

Grade Level

Undergraduate

Transcript

Report tries to make amends North Carolina sterilized nearly 8,000 residents By T. Kevin Walker The Chronicle —- After months of meetings, a committee has recommended to Gov. Mike Easley several ways that the state can right the many wrongs that took place under a state-sponsored sterilization program. Easley called for the formation of the committee last December, soon after he issued a public apology to forced sterilization victims. The state’s eugenics program was aimed at people who had certain sicknesses, disabilities or who were concerned “feebleminded.” North Carolina was one of many states that practiced forced sterilization. The state sterilized nearly 8,000 people from 1929 to 1974, although the law making the practice legal was still on the books up until earlier this year. State Rep. Larry Womble led the effort to repeal that law. Womble has been at the forefront of the movement to get the state to address the issue. Womble was the only lawmaker of the Eugenics Study Committee, which was chaired by Carmen Hooker Odom, secretary of the N.C. Department of Health and Human Services. See Eugenics on A4 Eugenics from page A1 Among the committee’s recommendations is the formation of a nonprofit foundation/support group for eugenics victims. The committee got the idea for the support group after it was suggested by the daughter of Nial Cox Ramirez, a sterilization victim who spoke to the committee. Elaine Riddick Jessie, another outspoken woman who was sterilized, also spoke before the committee. The committee report also recommends that special education programs be set up for the survivors through the UNC and community college systems, and that a special fund be created to help victims cover some of their health care costs. If the committee gets its way, it also would like a memorial established to serve as a permanent reminder of this shameful chapter in the state’s history. “I am very satisfied with the report,” Womble said Tuesday. “This committee really wanted to do what was right.” The committee said in its report that it believes that victims deserve some kind of financial compensation, although it is not one of the committee’s recommendations. The report says that a legislative study commission, which Womble has proposed in a House bill, would be a better body to explore the possibility of reparations. “Nothing is off limits,” Womble said. “We want to cover all the bases for (victims).” Womble’s bill is now in committee. In it, he calls for the Legislature to allocate $25,000 for a legislative study. Womble hopes the state will leave no stone unturned in this matter. “We need to do any and everything we can to at least try to make (victims) as whole again as possible and try to restore some of there [sic] dignity.” Womble said.

"Report tries to make amends," The Winston-Salem Chronicle

After Governor Michael Easley established a Eugenics Study Committee in late 2002, the Committee produced a set of recommendations meant to support eugenics victims. This article from The Winston-Salem Chronicle describes the recommendations, which include the creation of a foundation or support group, education programs, and a health care fund.

Contributed to DigitalNC by Forsyth County Public Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View Original View Transcript

Winston-Salem, N.C. (Forsyth County)

Background

First proposed by Sir Francis Galton in 1883, eugenics claims humankind can improve through selectively breeding for traits that are considered desirable or superior. Although eugenics is scientifically incorrect and unethical, the early to mid-twentieth century saw the eugenics movement gain widespread popularity across the United States, including North Carolina. From 1929 to the late 1970s, North Carolina upheld and validated the eugenics movement through legislation and public promotion of sterilization.

Sterilization procedures allowed North Carolina to restrict or eliminate the fertility of people who were considered “undesirable.” Some examples of “undesirable” people included individuals with mental disabilities. In the articles and advertisements in this set, these individuals are often referred to as “feebleminded” and “mentally defective.” Eugenics supporters believed that the children of such people could inherit their “inferior” traits, causing a “burden” on the parents, the public, and the state. By sterilizing people, they thought the burden could be alleviated. While sterilization was aimed at people with disabilities, the procedure was also used extensively on non-white people or people whose sexual or social behavior was considered “defective.” Selective sterilization groups like the Human Betterment League claimed that the procedure was done with the consent of the patient or their family. However, many individuals were forced or coerced into sterilization.

In 1929, the General Assembly passed a law that permitted the sterilization of individuals held in any charitable or penal institutions in North Carolina when the sterilization was determined to be the best course of action for the individual or for the public good. In 1933, the General Assembly established the North Carolina Eugenics Board. Made up of five state government members, the Eugenics Board was responsible for reviewing and approving all sterilization procedures in North Carolina. In 1937, Assembly members passed another act that permitted state hospitals to temporarily admit and sterilize people who had been approved for the procedure by the Eugenics Board. While sterilization and eugenics were normalized and embraced in North Carolina during the early to mid-20th century, the 1970s saw public criticism rise. After a name change from the Eugenics Board to the Eugenics Commission in 1973, the group was abolished by the General Assembly in 1977.

In 2002, Governor Michael Easley made an official declaration to victims of forced or coerced sterilization. He apologized for the role that the North Carolina government had played in supporting and promoting selective sterilization. Easley also established a Eugenics Study Committee. In 2003, he repealed legislation that still made sterilization legal in the state. In a report made by the Eugenics Study Committee, members stated their belief that North Carolina should provide financial compensation to victims. Representative Larry Womble, who was part of the committee, later introduced a bill to give a sum of money to those affected by forced sterilization. However, it was not until 2010, when the Office of Justice for Sterilization Victims was created, that a compensation plan was put in place. By 2014, eligible individuals who made a claim to the Office received $20,000 or more as payment. Some have called the program flawed, as many victims were thought to have died by the time it was created. Moreover, only individuals whose sterilizations were approved by the Eugenics Board could file a claim; others who were sterilized under a different authority’s mandate were not able to receive compensation from the Office.

Discussion Questions

  1. Consider the first and second newspaper advertisement from the Human Betterment League. How do they describe the consequences of not sterilizing “feebleminded” and “mentally deficient” individuals? What tactics do they use to defend and justify sterilization procedures?

  2. Many of the primary sources in this set are newspaper articles or advertisements that promote selective sterilization to the public. How did mass media–like newspapers–influence the North Carolina public’s perspective on eugenics and sterilization?

  3. From the early to mid-twentieth century, selective sterilization was normalized and even encouraged in North Carolina. What factors contributed to the normalization and general support of sterilization?

  4. While the North Carolina government eventually established a compensation initiative for forced sterilization victims in 2010 and began payments in 2014, many have pointed out the flaws in the initiative. What are some of the issues in the compensation program, and what could the North Carolina government have done to better support victims of forced sterilization? Is there anything North Carolina can do today?

  5. Consider the viewpoints in The Carolina Times article, The North Carolina Catholic article, and The News-Journal article. What different perspectives do you notice in each piece? How does criticism of sterilization in The Carolina Times article differ from that in The North Carolina Catholic piece?

  6. Take a look at the article from The Smithfield Herald, making sure to notice the ways in which “better babies” are described. How does the “Better Babies Health Contest” connect to other eugenicist concepts, like selective sterilization?

This primary source set was compiled by Isabella Walker.

Updated January 2025