Primary Source Set

Jim Crow South: Life in North Carolina Post Civil War-1930’s

Following the long history of enslavement and the resulting Civil War, states within the U.S. adopted racist and segregationist policies that became known as Jim Crow laws. The years that these laws were in place (starting after the Civil War through 1968) came to be known as the Jim Crow era. This assortment of newspapers, photographs, and other types of documentation describes the lived experiences of people in North Carolina during Jim Crow post Civil War to the 1930’s. 

Proceed with caution and care through these materials as the content may be disturbing or difficult to review. Specifically, there are mentions and descriptions of racist and white supremacist violence and murders, oppression based on race, racist and white supremacist language, and offensive former race labels. Please read DigitalNC’s Harmful Content statement for further guidance. 

Time Period

1865-1930's

Grade Level

Undergraduate

Transcript

(Clipping 1) PLEA FOR WHITE SUPREMACY. STRONG SPEECH BY A BRAVE MAN. Dan Hugh McLean Depict the Horrors of Negro Rule and Tells. Why Suffrage Should be Restricted- White People of the State Not Responsible for the Negroes Enfranchisement- They Will be Held Responsible if He is Allowed to Continue to Vote… (Clipping 2) In taking the ballot away from the negro the speaker asserted that we were robbing him of no right, for the negro never had any moral or legal right to vote in North Carolina or participate in any of the affairs of government. He explained that the amendment to the constitution conferring the right of franchise on the negroes was never legally adopted in North Carolina, since the negroes themselves were permitted to vote on its ratification, while more than 30,000 good and true white men were not allowed to vote. This thing was done in the passion of the hour, when North Carolina stood uncovered and defenceless in the presence of a conquering foe. Our people were compelled to bow their necks to the yoke of oppression. "The enfranchisement of the negro was a menace to the safety of the white man and a clog in the wheels of the chariot of progress." After the manner in which this amendment to the constitution was adopted in North Carolina, Mr. McLean declared that it does not lie in the mouths of the Republicans to talk of the Democratic party disfranchising any white man. The Republican is the only party that has ever hindered a white man in exercising the right of suffrage… (Clipping 3) The condition of affairs in many Eastern counties under negro rule was depicted in a true and forceful manner, the speaker saying that if we fail to adopt the amendment North Carolina will be the only place in the known world where a negro will be the equal of a white man In such an event a black wave of immigration, worse than th devouring locusts of Egypt, would set in, and all virtue, beauty and glory would be dead. In concluding, Mr. McLean said that no white man in North Carolina should consider that his business was at home on August 2nd, for his business was at the ballot box, to guard that ark of the covenant until it should be placed securely in the temple of white supremacy. (Clipping 4) TO ASSASSINATE WHITE MEN. BOAST OF AN IMPUDENT NEGRO. "If the Amendment is Adopted Every Building in Whitsett Will be Burned and White Babies Will be Taken from Their Cradles, Says Eli Wharton The Desperation of the Revenue Doodlers And Bushwhackers…. (Clipping 5) In a conversation at Whitsett, Rock Creek township, a few days ago Eli Wharton, a negro, boasted that if the constitutional amendment was adopted every building in Whitsett would be burned to the ground, and the white babies would be taken from their cradles by unknown hands. He added that white men would be called out at night and shot to death, and nobody would know who did it. The conversation of this would-be incendiary and assassin, a constituent of the Republican nominees in this county, was overheard by four well known gentlemen of the community who are ready to make an affidavit to its occurrence. They are: J. D. Oldham, George Davenport, T. G. Boone and O. M. Ingold. There can be no doubt of the fact that Eli Wharton made the above statement, and it is probable that, he trade it at the suggestion of some white Republican who will find it convenient to be beyond the reach of danger should harm befall the impudent negro.

Greensboro telegram. (Greensboro, N.C.) [7/7/1900]

The Greensboro Telegram was a newspaper based in Greensboro, NC, and in 1900 it had a strong Democrat, white supremacy leaning to its editing. This edition features an article titled “Plea for White Supremacy: Strong Speech by a Brave Man,” which features a public speech given by Dan Hugh McLean, who was a former Confederate soldier. The paper applauded his statements that Black voters were a “menace to the safety of the white man” and his warning that a failure to vote would lead to racial equality that would spur mass Black migration to the state of North Carolina.

Contributed to DigitalNC by University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View Original View Transcript

Greensboro, NC (Guilford County)

Jim Crow South: Life in North Carolina Post Civil War-1930’s

Print/Download

Background

The Advent of Slavery in the United States

Slavery had become a global institution with the rise of colonialism and the ideology of distinct races; a chosen hierarchy accompanied this construct, now known as white supremacy, and was used to justify the violence enacted through colonization. As the now named Americas were colonized, enslaved people from Africa began to be brought to the colonies during the early 1600’s, and the practice of slavery grew exponentially from this point.

Slavery was a strongly held American institution until the idea of abolition began to gain more widespread support in the early and mid-1800’s. Many people had been strongly advocating against the violent practice of slavery and undermining its power over enslaved people since its inception, and the 1800’s saw a culmination of these efforts. Regardless of the motivations, whether moral or economic, the reality of abolition became clear and a Civil War (1861-1865) resulted between the industrial Northern states within the Union and the Southern states, which held most of the enslaved population and, consequently, those that most directly profited from the continued practice of slavery.

Post-Civil War Reconstruction

After the Emancipation Proclamation (1863) issued by president Lincoln declaring the end of slavery and then the Union’s victory in the Civil War (1865), the Reconstruction period began in the South to rebuild and restructure the post-war region, circa 1865-1877. The 13th amendment was ratified into the Constitution and officially prohibited the practice of slavery within the United States. However, the legacy of slavery and racism persisted; its influence could be found in the language of the 13th amendment that abolished slavery (except for slavery in the form of being incarcerated), in the newly created laws that continued white supremacist ideology, and in the everyday actions and anti-Black beliefs held by individuals throughout the country.

“Jim Crow”

The term ‘Jim Crow’ came from the phrase coined by a popular song used in minstrel shows, which were performances centered on mocking African Americans. This is also where the act of Black-face gained popularity. The racist phrase ‘Jim Crow’ became the name given to the era of repression and segregation in the United States marked by racist and segregationist laws. It prohibited non-white people from certain areas or from engaging in certain activities (e.g. drinking from separate water fountains or only being allowed to sit in designated sections of public venues). More discreet laws were implemented discriminatorily, like requiring a poll tax or written test in order to vote. This began primarily after the Reconstruction period in response to the increased participation of Black people in the community and politics, especially with the success of Black politicians in being elected in Southern states.

These laws were in place throughout the country, not only the South, although the South’s history with slavery and resentment from its abolition among politicians and former slaveholders created a hostile environment in the region. Many people began to identify certain areas as “Sundown Towns” because they knew them to be unsafe for any Black person to visit after dark. Some towns even had signs that proclaimed the entire area “for whites only,” much like those posted by businesses or on public restrooms throughout the country.

People experienced oppression both structurally through these racist laws and personally from individual people. Strongly held racist ideologies gave rise to white supremacist organizations, like the Klu Klux Klan, and spontaneous mobs that resulted in terrorizing Black people and the practice of lynchings. The reality of life throughout the South was marred by violence and oppression, and these occurrences became mostly Southern violence.

Resistance to Oppression

In response, communities began to organize and resist structural and communal oppression. Many Black communities were founded during this time due to segregation, and their exclusion from public life saw the creation of many Black-owned businesses. In North Carolina, there were multiple Black-run newspapers that reported both on the issues their community was facing and that celebrated their joys and accomplishments. For example, you could find on a front page both an update on possible desegregation of interstate transportation, as well as congratulations for the recently graduated local high school students.

While the passing of the Civil Rights Act in 1965 and the Fair Housing Act of 1968 saw the legal end of explicit Jim Crow laws, some would argue that Jim Crow persists in the racist policies and practices still ingrained in many institutions, like under-funding historically Black communities. By exploring the documented history and the lived experiences of people during this time in North Carolina, we can understand its impacts and lasting effects on people and our communities.

Discussion Questions

  1. Wilmington Massacre

    • Compare the article written by The Daily Record prior to the massacre and then the article by the Semi-Weekly after the massacre. With no other information, what would you conclude to have happened during the Wilmington Massacre?*
    • Now read this article on the background of the events. Did your perspective of the events change? What information was brought to light that was not included, was altered, or was denied by the semi-weekly?*
    • What political or personal agendas/perspectives were at play in the publishing of the daily record and the semi-weekly? How might people have determined the truth of the events in 1898?**
    • When analyzing mass media (e.g newspapers, tv news outlets, etc.), how can people determine the underlying agendas that influence how information is presented?**
    • In a world supposedly filled with “fake news,” how do people determine what is “true” news? Should news be true to be considered information? If so, is untrue news not information? Why or why not?**
    • How does morality and ethics relate to truth and what does it mean for certain ideologies (e.g. integration or racial justice) to become societal norms/truths?**
  2. Greensboro Telegram (1900) and Goodbye Carolina (1964)

    • Read the article “Plea for White Supremacy: Strong Speech by a Brave Man” from the Greensboro Telegram and then watch the “Goodbye Carolina” video from 1964. How do these pieces of media stand in opposition to each other?*
      • Were the fears of mass Black migration to North Carolina if racial equality through voter’s rights were achieved as described in the article in the Greensboro Telegram a founded fear? Why or why not?**
    • Review this 1962 article “Elections and Mass Media” by Stanley Kelley Jr. What role did mass media play in campaigning during the 1900 election cycle in North Carolina? How does it play a role in our elections today?*
  3. Reality of Voting in NC

    • Review this article on NCPedia’s website about the history of the poll tax in NC. What would you say the policy for access to voting would be before and after the amendment in 1919?*
    • Now review these poll tax receipts (one and two), this voter registration list from Blowing Rock, NC, and this 1952 article regarding access to voting in NC. What do these documents tell you about the realities of voting and access to voting in North Carolina during Jim Crow? Do you think that access to voting was consistent across the state?**
    • Based on historic methods of undermining access to voting, how do you think that legacy impacts us today? Can you find any evidence that confirms or refutes your suppositions?**
  4. After reviewing the examples of newspaper articles from historically Black-owned newspapers and historically white-owned newspapers in North Carolina, what is the significance of having Black-run newspapers during this time?**

  5. After viewing the classroom of Mrs. Dunesbury’s and Mrs. Cooper’s classroom, compare this to Jamestown, NC white school classroom. What differences do you notice? What does this tell you about the funding and support for these different schools?*

    • Does this point to any issues with the “separate but equal” policy instituted through Plessy v. Ferguson? Why or why not?**
  6. What can you conclude about the reality of the Jim Crow era in North Carolina based on these sources?**

     

    * Questions that check for comprehension

    ** Questions that involve a “deeper dive” in conceptual and historical analysis

This primary source set was compiled by cal lane.

Updated January 2025