Primary Source Set

Jim Crow South: Life in North Carolina Post Civil War-1930’s

Following the long history of enslavement and the resulting Civil War, states within the U.S. adopted racist and segregationist policies that became known as Jim Crow laws. The years that these laws were in place (starting after the Civil War through 1968) came to be known as the Jim Crow era. This assortment of newspapers, photographs, and other types of documentation describes the lived experiences of people in North Carolina during Jim Crow post Civil War to the 1930’s. 

Proceed with caution and care through these materials as the content may be disturbing or difficult to review. Specifically, there are mentions and descriptions of racist and white supremacist violence and murders, oppression based on race, racist and white supremacist language, and offensive former race labels. Please read DigitalNC’s Harmful Content statement for further guidance. 

Time Period

1865-1930's

Grade Level

Undergraduate

Transcript

In modern times, adverse winds have driven the Chinaman from one side of the world to the other, and thousands of that populous of all nations now dock to our shores, and at no distant period, some of these despised foreigners may be our rulers. It has been truly said that man proposes and God disposes. The class of people once our slaves, have been made freemen and fellow citizens by the very means which we resorted to, to keep them in bondage. Where, opportunities have been offered, the black man h s shown his ability to measure arms of intellectual vigor with those of his fair neighbors. Who, therefore, can reasonably object to any free citizen, of whatever complexion or name, for elevating himself to popular favor and high places of trust and honor. The fact is, it should be our pleasure, as it is our privilege to help a race once trodden down, to go up in civilization, in moral and intellectual culture, to take their place among us as men, and to feel proud that they are American citizens. Millions of money have been spent and most valuable lives lost in endeavoring to ameliorate and elevate the condition of foreign nations, and race of men who have no claim upon us. And are our prejudices so blind as to make us abhor our own people, who though once slaves, have spent their lives in our support, labored from dawn to duskey eve to make us food and raiment, and in many instances sacrificed their lives for the happiness of the white man? Those who have nourished and protected us when children, sported with us on the green, watched and cared for us in sickness–our companions in the chase and in the field–shall we show no appreciation of such life-long kindness? Those who took care of our helpless families while for many long years we were engaged in a most bloody war, and that, too, to keep them in bondage? Was there ever such ingratitude known among any people, if we should now turn against the best friends we ever had, and prevent their progress to high and honorable positions among their own people among whom they were born and raised, and for centuries struggled on without a murmur or complaint? Shall we be guilty of such cruelty? Forbid it, Almighty God! Forbid it, Heaven! Very respectfully yours, &c., J. H. And Whereas, in divers other localities peaceable citizens have been insulted in their houses, put in fear for their lives, whipped, scourged, maltreated, mutilated and murdered by persons disguised, and known as the Kuklux Klan : And Whereas, retaliation has commenced by the burning of barns, stables, and mills: And Whereas, all these evils are to be traced to the Kuklux Klan aforesaid, though no apology can be offered for the retaliation refe[rred] to, for it is equally to be deplored and reprobated as a wicked violation of the law ; and upon due information laid before me, (which information has not been furnished,) that barns, or stables, or mills, or dwelling houses, have been burned by incendiaries, mentioning localities and the persons to whom the said barns, or stables, or mills, or dwelling bouses belonged, rewards will also be offered for the arrest and conviction of the incendiaries aforesaid. Now, Therefore. I, William W. Holden, Govern of the State of North Carolina, do issue this my proclamation, offering a reward of FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS for the arrest of each of the murderers of the wife and children of Daniel Blue, of each of the murderers of Wyatt Outlaw, of each of the murderers of John W. Stephens, of each of the murderers of Robin Jacobs, of each of the persons who committed rape on the bodies of the colored women referred to, of each of the persons who murdered Puryear, and of each of the persons who murdered Neill McLeod and Daniel McLeod, and robbed the family of the said Neill McLeod, together with such evidence as will lead to the conviction of the persons thus arrested ; those who planned, advised or counselled the commission of the act ; those who participated in the act or acts ; or those who conspired to conceal the bodies of the murdered, or aided in the concealment and escape of the felons: And I enjoin upon all officers, civil and military, to aid in bringing these and all other offenders to justice ; and especially to discountenance, discourage, and repress all organizations of men who ride or walk at night in disguise, with arms in their hands. It is a misdemeanor thus to go disguised, and it is felony if these disguised persons molest or injure peaceable citizens in their persons or property. Done at our city of Raleigh, this 6th [l. s.] of June, A D., 1870. and in the 94th year of our Independence. W. W. HOLDEN, Governor. By the Governor : W. R. Richardson, Private Secretary.

The weekly standard. (Raleigh, N.C.) [7/27/1870]

The Weekly Standard, whose editor at the time was Wiliam Alexander Smith, was based in Raleigh, NC. This edition included opinion pieces on the rise of the Klu Klux Klan (KKK) and the ties to North Carolina’s Democratic party and its politicians. While still politically motivated to increase support for the Republican party, the articles in the newspaper reflected the conditions in the state and the connections between Democratic politicians and the rise of the KKK. On page two, the paper had reprinted a statement by the current Governor and the Standard’s former editor, William W. Holden, on the long list of racial violence perpetrated by the KKK in North Carolina in detail, as well as the governor’s call for military intervention to end the KKK’s activity in the state. Eventually, the persons detained for these crimes were released, and the Democratic party gained momentum in North Carolina, effectively instituting white supremacy and Jim Crow across the state.

Contributed to DigitalNC by University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View Original View Transcript

Jim Crow South: Life in North Carolina Post Civil War-1930’s

Print/Download

Background

The Advent of Slavery in the United States

Slavery had become a global institution with the rise of colonialism and the ideology of distinct races; a chosen hierarchy accompanied this construct, now known as white supremacy, and was used to justify the violence enacted through colonization. As the now named Americas were colonized, enslaved people from Africa began to be brought to the colonies during the early 1600’s, and the practice of slavery grew exponentially from this point.

Slavery was a strongly held American institution until the idea of abolition began to gain more widespread support in the early and mid-1800’s. Many people had been strongly advocating against the violent practice of slavery and undermining its power over enslaved people since its inception, and the 1800’s saw a culmination of these efforts. Regardless of the motivations, whether moral or economic, the reality of abolition became clear and a Civil War (1861-1865) resulted between the industrial Northern states within the Union and the Southern states, which held most of the enslaved population and, consequently, those that most directly profited from the continued practice of slavery.

Post-Civil War Reconstruction

After the Emancipation Proclamation (1863) issued by president Lincoln declaring the end of slavery and then the Union’s victory in the Civil War (1865), the Reconstruction period began in the South to rebuild and restructure the post-war region, circa 1865-1877. The 13th amendment was ratified into the Constitution and officially prohibited the practice of slavery within the United States. However, the legacy of slavery and racism persisted; its influence could be found in the language of the 13th amendment that abolished slavery (except for slavery in the form of being incarcerated), in the newly created laws that continued white supremacist ideology, and in the everyday actions and anti-Black beliefs held by individuals throughout the country.

“Jim Crow”

The term ‘Jim Crow’ came from the phrase coined by a popular song used in minstrel shows, which were performances centered on mocking African Americans. This is also where the act of Black-face gained popularity. The racist phrase ‘Jim Crow’ became the name given to the era of repression and segregation in the United States marked by racist and segregationist laws. It prohibited non-white people from certain areas or from engaging in certain activities (e.g. drinking from separate water fountains or only being allowed to sit in designated sections of public venues). More discreet laws were implemented discriminatorily, like requiring a poll tax or written test in order to vote. This began primarily after the Reconstruction period in response to the increased participation of Black people in the community and politics, especially with the success of Black politicians in being elected in Southern states.

These laws were in place throughout the country, not only the South, although the South’s history with slavery and resentment from its abolition among politicians and former slaveholders created a hostile environment in the region. Many people began to identify certain areas as “Sundown Towns” because they knew them to be unsafe for any Black person to visit after dark. Some towns even had signs that proclaimed the entire area “for whites only,” much like those posted by businesses or on public restrooms throughout the country.

People experienced oppression both structurally through these racist laws and personally from individual people. Strongly held racist ideologies gave rise to white supremacist organizations, like the Klu Klux Klan, and spontaneous mobs that resulted in terrorizing Black people and the practice of lynchings. The reality of life throughout the South was marred by violence and oppression, and these occurrences became mostly Southern violence.

Resistance to Oppression

In response, communities began to organize and resist structural and communal oppression. Many Black communities were founded during this time due to segregation, and their exclusion from public life saw the creation of many Black-owned businesses. In North Carolina, there were multiple Black-run newspapers that reported both on the issues their community was facing and that celebrated their joys and accomplishments. For example, you could find on a front page both an update on possible desegregation of interstate transportation, as well as congratulations for the recently graduated local high school students.

While the passing of the Civil Rights Act in 1965 and the Fair Housing Act of 1968 saw the legal end of explicit Jim Crow laws, some would argue that Jim Crow persists in the racist policies and practices still ingrained in many institutions, like under-funding historically Black communities. By exploring the documented history and the lived experiences of people during this time in North Carolina, we can understand its impacts and lasting effects on people and our communities.

Discussion Questions

  1. Wilmington Massacre

    • Compare the article written by The Daily Record prior to the massacre and then the article by the Semi-Weekly after the massacre. With no other information, what would you conclude to have happened during the Wilmington Massacre?*
    • Now read this article on the background of the events. Did your perspective of the events change? What information was brought to light that was not included, was altered, or was denied by the semi-weekly?*
    • What political or personal agendas/perspectives were at play in the publishing of the daily record and the semi-weekly? How might people have determined the truth of the events in 1898?**
    • When analyzing mass media (e.g newspapers, tv news outlets, etc.), how can people determine the underlying agendas that influence how information is presented?**
    • In a world supposedly filled with “fake news,” how do people determine what is “true” news? Should news be true to be considered information? If so, is untrue news not information? Why or why not?**
    • How does morality and ethics relate to truth and what does it mean for certain ideologies (e.g. integration or racial justice) to become societal norms/truths?**
  2. Greensboro Telegram (1900) and Goodbye Carolina (1964)

    • Read the article “Plea for White Supremacy: Strong Speech by a Brave Man” from the Greensboro Telegram and then watch the “Goodbye Carolina” video from 1964. How do these pieces of media stand in opposition to each other?*
      • Were the fears of mass Black migration to North Carolina if racial equality through voter’s rights were achieved as described in the article in the Greensboro Telegram a founded fear? Why or why not?**
    • Review this 1962 article “Elections and Mass Media” by Stanley Kelley Jr. What role did mass media play in campaigning during the 1900 election cycle in North Carolina? How does it play a role in our elections today?*
  3. Reality of Voting in NC

    • Review this article on NCPedia’s website about the history of the poll tax in NC. What would you say the policy for access to voting would be before and after the amendment in 1919?*
    • Now review these poll tax receipts (one and two), this voter registration list from Blowing Rock, NC, and this 1952 article regarding access to voting in NC. What do these documents tell you about the realities of voting and access to voting in North Carolina during Jim Crow? Do you think that access to voting was consistent across the state?**
    • Based on historic methods of undermining access to voting, how do you think that legacy impacts us today? Can you find any evidence that confirms or refutes your suppositions?**
  4. After reviewing the examples of newspaper articles from historically Black-owned newspapers and historically white-owned newspapers in North Carolina, what is the significance of having Black-run newspapers during this time?**

  5. After viewing the classroom of Mrs. Dunesbury’s and Mrs. Cooper’s classroom, compare this to Jamestown, NC white school classroom. What differences do you notice? What does this tell you about the funding and support for these different schools?*

    • Does this point to any issues with the “separate but equal” policy instituted through Plessy v. Ferguson? Why or why not?**
  6. What can you conclude about the reality of the Jim Crow era in North Carolina based on these sources?**

     

    * Questions that check for comprehension

    ** Questions that involve a “deeper dive” in conceptual and historical analysis

This primary source set was compiled by cal lane.

Updated January 2025