Primary Source Set

Jim Crow South: Life in North Carolina Post Civil War-1930’s

Following the long history of enslavement and the resulting Civil War, states within the U.S. adopted racist and segregationist policies that became known as Jim Crow laws. The years that these laws were in place (starting after the Civil War through 1968) came to be known as the Jim Crow era. This assortment of newspapers, photographs, and other types of documentation describes the lived experiences of people in North Carolina during Jim Crow post Civil War to the 1930’s. 

Proceed with caution and care through these materials as the content may be disturbing or difficult to review. Specifically, there are mentions and descriptions of racist and white supremacist violence and murders, oppression based on race, racist and white supremacist language, and offensive former race labels. Please read DigitalNC’s Harmful Content statement for further guidance. 

Time Period

1865-1930's

Grade Level

Undergraduate

Transcript

JUDGE PELL FEARS ABOLITION OF “JIM CROW” CARS UNDER GOVERNMENT CONTROL WRITES PROTEST TO SENATOR SIMMONS. Judge George P. Pell, of the North Carolina Corporation Commission, o[p]poses government ownership of railroads because he fears such control would mean the abolition of Jim Crow [faded word] which fact he maintains [faded word] be a serious thing for the [faded word]. He urges the Ne[faded section] delegation in Co[faded section] some sort of rac[faded section] that will force the railroads back to private control” so that the impending danger may be averted. His letter to Senator Lee S. Overman in the News and Observer under date of Dec. 11, urges the Senator to “get busy” less the State’s authority be usurped. The following is an extract from the same: “The people of North Carolina are appealing to members of our commission to do something to prevent the calamity to the State threatened by a continuance of the national control of the railroads. “Four years ago you will remember we had an uprising in our State, led by Honorable F[faded] Justice and the just freight rate association, which finally resulted in a compromise so as to relieve North Carolina partially of her great disadvantage in competing with Virginia cities, the relief only applying to goods shipped into the State through the Ohio and Mississippi river crossings. When this much of a victory was won we thought we would have a rest, but the Virginia cities brought the matter up in another form before the Interstate Commerce Commission and, after a long struggle, we won out. “Now, the nation railroad administration is about to put into effect a mileage zeale of rates and in new classification scheme which will not only wipe out every advantage we have gained, but put us in a far worse position that ever. We are hopeful that before this can be [torn and faded section] Sort of racket that will force the railroads back to private control. “The question of government ownership or absolute control is a very serious one for the South. It is not only socialistic in principle but will result in much that is harmful to us. aside from its effect on our rates. It must ultimately result in the abolition of the Jim Crow cars and the deprival of the State of their taxes received from the railroads. Besides the shippers all think it means the same poor accommodation afforded in countries when absolute control exists. “It seems that another railroad investigation similar to the Newlands investigation is going to be held to detrmine the government policy as to railroads. It is to be hoped that our members of Congress will see that some true blue Southerners are on this committee investigation, but is preferable that no Virginian or Georgian be on it. “I do trust that you will exert every effort to avert the disaster mentioned and especially that disasters of allowing the Federal government to usurp the police powers of the States over railroads.” Commenting on this letter The State Journal contained the following editorial under date of December 13: “Judge George P. Pell of the North Carolina Corporation Commission writes a letter to Senator Overman urging that gentleman to see that in a future railroad investigation only “true blue Southerners,” so far as they are Southerners shall sit on such a committee, and that we must prepare against this monstrous doctrine which may ignore the rates made by State commissions as well as the Jim Crow car. In fact, Judge Pell is fearful that Jim Crow civilization is itself imperiled. It may be well enough to talk about New York Negroes smashing the Hindenburg line and Southern Negroes fighting side by side of Southern whites to make the world safe for democracy. The world may be thinking away from Jim Crow soldiery and statesmanship, but before it goes too far, let it be known that the paramount issue in these digings is whether the white shall ride in cars reasonably safe, well-kept and fairly policed or wher the black shall be perpetually jeopardized by coaches in which there is no earthly care shown. But the judge’s contribution to Senator Overman’s worries is more interesting because of its robust nationalism. True blue Southerners who are geographically acceptable to North Carolina must be put on the railroad invstigating committee which will determine whether the carriers are to be privately or publicly controlled. If publicly, that is to say, nationally owned, class consciousness parochialism, and even race consciousness will measurably disappear and this, thinks Judge Pell, would be “very serious” for the South. But, seriously, what is the occasion for making more desperate the plight of the Black Man who is behaving himself, working well, being patriotic [faded section] getting [faded word], and trying his best to forget that he is a Black Man? Why hammer without any provocation, into him every day day that he is black and marked off? Why worry the Negro by suggestion with fear of rigorous application of the old? When and where did Jim Crow cars get on? Who is saying anything about it or demanding that the law be changed? But here is a State officer who cannot wait for the troops, white and black, to come home without rubbing it into the blacks. Whatever they have fought for is not to alter our statutes or to melt our hearts. He must continue ignorant as to where he shall turn. For, we are determined to know nothing down here but the Dam[racist slur] and Him Terrified.” All of which makes interesting reading.

'Judge Pell Fears Abolition of “Jim Crow” Cars Under Government Control' The Raleigh independent. (Raleigh, N.C.) [12/21/1918]

The Raleigh Independent was an influential Black newspaper in the Raleigh area, reporting on local and national issues affecting the Black community. In this issue, the paper reports on North Carolina Judge Pell imploring senators to oppose the nationalization of railroads to “prevent the calamity” of ending Jim Crow and integrating public transportation. This issue also includes reports on Black military members, who were in their own segregated military units, and the upcoming Emancipation Day celebration.

Contributed to DigitalNC by State Archives of North Carolina

View Original View Transcript

Raleigh, NC (Wake County)

Jim Crow South: Life in North Carolina Post Civil War-1930’s

Print/Download

Background

The Advent of Slavery in the United States

Slavery had become a global institution with the rise of colonialism and the ideology of distinct races; a chosen hierarchy accompanied this construct, now known as white supremacy, and was used to justify the violence enacted through colonization. As the now named Americas were colonized, enslaved people from Africa began to be brought to the colonies during the early 1600’s, and the practice of slavery grew exponentially from this point.

Slavery was a strongly held American institution until the idea of abolition began to gain more widespread support in the early and mid-1800’s. Many people had been strongly advocating against the violent practice of slavery and undermining its power over enslaved people since its inception, and the 1800’s saw a culmination of these efforts. Regardless of the motivations, whether moral or economic, the reality of abolition became clear and a Civil War (1861-1865) resulted between the industrial Northern states within the Union and the Southern states, which held most of the enslaved population and, consequently, those that most directly profited from the continued practice of slavery.

Post-Civil War Reconstruction

After the Emancipation Proclamation (1863) issued by president Lincoln declaring the end of slavery and then the Union’s victory in the Civil War (1865), the Reconstruction period began in the South to rebuild and restructure the post-war region, circa 1865-1877. The 13th amendment was ratified into the Constitution and officially prohibited the practice of slavery within the United States. However, the legacy of slavery and racism persisted; its influence could be found in the language of the 13th amendment that abolished slavery (except for slavery in the form of being incarcerated), in the newly created laws that continued white supremacist ideology, and in the everyday actions and anti-Black beliefs held by individuals throughout the country.

“Jim Crow”

The term ‘Jim Crow’ came from the phrase coined by a popular song used in minstrel shows, which were performances centered on mocking African Americans. This is also where the act of Black-face gained popularity. The racist phrase ‘Jim Crow’ became the name given to the era of repression and segregation in the United States marked by racist and segregationist laws. It prohibited non-white people from certain areas or from engaging in certain activities (e.g. drinking from separate water fountains or only being allowed to sit in designated sections of public venues). More discreet laws were implemented discriminatorily, like requiring a poll tax or written test in order to vote. This began primarily after the Reconstruction period in response to the increased participation of Black people in the community and politics, especially with the success of Black politicians in being elected in Southern states.

These laws were in place throughout the country, not only the South, although the South’s history with slavery and resentment from its abolition among politicians and former slaveholders created a hostile environment in the region. Many people began to identify certain areas as “Sundown Towns” because they knew them to be unsafe for any Black person to visit after dark. Some towns even had signs that proclaimed the entire area “for whites only,” much like those posted by businesses or on public restrooms throughout the country.

People experienced oppression both structurally through these racist laws and personally from individual people. Strongly held racist ideologies gave rise to white supremacist organizations, like the Klu Klux Klan, and spontaneous mobs that resulted in terrorizing Black people and the practice of lynchings. The reality of life throughout the South was marred by violence and oppression, and these occurrences became mostly Southern violence.

Resistance to Oppression

In response, communities began to organize and resist structural and communal oppression. Many Black communities were founded during this time due to segregation, and their exclusion from public life saw the creation of many Black-owned businesses. In North Carolina, there were multiple Black-run newspapers that reported both on the issues their community was facing and that celebrated their joys and accomplishments. For example, you could find on a front page both an update on possible desegregation of interstate transportation, as well as congratulations for the recently graduated local high school students.

While the passing of the Civil Rights Act in 1965 and the Fair Housing Act of 1968 saw the legal end of explicit Jim Crow laws, some would argue that Jim Crow persists in the racist policies and practices still ingrained in many institutions, like under-funding historically Black communities. By exploring the documented history and the lived experiences of people during this time in North Carolina, we can understand its impacts and lasting effects on people and our communities.

Discussion Questions

  1. Wilmington Massacre

    • Compare the article written by The Daily Record prior to the massacre and then the article by the Semi-Weekly after the massacre. With no other information, what would you conclude to have happened during the Wilmington Massacre?*
    • Now read this article on the background of the events. Did your perspective of the events change? What information was brought to light that was not included, was altered, or was denied by the semi-weekly?*
    • What political or personal agendas/perspectives were at play in the publishing of the daily record and the semi-weekly? How might people have determined the truth of the events in 1898?**
    • When analyzing mass media (e.g newspapers, tv news outlets, etc.), how can people determine the underlying agendas that influence how information is presented?**
    • In a world supposedly filled with “fake news,” how do people determine what is “true” news? Should news be true to be considered information? If so, is untrue news not information? Why or why not?**
    • How does morality and ethics relate to truth and what does it mean for certain ideologies (e.g. integration or racial justice) to become societal norms/truths?**
  2. Greensboro Telegram (1900) and Goodbye Carolina (1964)

    • Read the article “Plea for White Supremacy: Strong Speech by a Brave Man” from the Greensboro Telegram and then watch the “Goodbye Carolina” video from 1964. How do these pieces of media stand in opposition to each other?*
      • Were the fears of mass Black migration to North Carolina if racial equality through voter’s rights were achieved as described in the article in the Greensboro Telegram a founded fear? Why or why not?**
    • Review this 1962 article “Elections and Mass Media” by Stanley Kelley Jr. What role did mass media play in campaigning during the 1900 election cycle in North Carolina? How does it play a role in our elections today?*
  3. Reality of Voting in NC

    • Review this article on NCPedia’s website about the history of the poll tax in NC. What would you say the policy for access to voting would be before and after the amendment in 1919?*
    • Now review these poll tax receipts (one and two), this voter registration list from Blowing Rock, NC, and this 1952 article regarding access to voting in NC. What do these documents tell you about the realities of voting and access to voting in North Carolina during Jim Crow? Do you think that access to voting was consistent across the state?**
    • Based on historic methods of undermining access to voting, how do you think that legacy impacts us today? Can you find any evidence that confirms or refutes your suppositions?**
  4. After reviewing the examples of newspaper articles from historically Black-owned newspapers and historically white-owned newspapers in North Carolina, what is the significance of having Black-run newspapers during this time?**

  5. After viewing the classroom of Mrs. Dunesbury’s and Mrs. Cooper’s classroom, compare this to Jamestown, NC white school classroom. What differences do you notice? What does this tell you about the funding and support for these different schools?*

    • Does this point to any issues with the “separate but equal” policy instituted through Plessy v. Ferguson? Why or why not?**
  6. What can you conclude about the reality of the Jim Crow era in North Carolina based on these sources?**

     

    * Questions that check for comprehension

    ** Questions that involve a “deeper dive” in conceptual and historical analysis

This primary source set was compiled by cal lane.

Updated January 2025